Mar 31, 2011
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of MUKUNDA INDUSTRIAL
FINANCE LIMITED as at 31st March 2011 and also Profit and Loss Account
and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
1. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
2. As required by the Companies (Auditor s Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of
section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure
hereto a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of
the said order to the extent applicable.
3. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to paragraph 2
above and schedule 16 to Balance Sheet, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as it appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the Chairman
and Managing Director, as on 31st March 2011, we report that none of
the directors is disqualified as on 31st March 2011 from being
appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of
section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, they said accounts subject to Point no. 1
(d) of Annexure to Auditors Report and note no. 2,10,11 and 15 in Notes
on Accounts in Schedule No. 16 part B, give the information required by
the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and
fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally
accepted in India: -
i. in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March 2011;
ii. in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the loss for the
year ended on that date; and
iii. in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the Cash Flows for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT OF MUKUNDA INDUSTRIAL FINANCE LIMITED
(Referred to in Paragraph 2 of our report of even date)
1. In respect of its fixed assets:
a. The Company has maintained relevant records and papers, which
indicate the necessary particulars of quantitative details and
situation of fixed assets on the basis of available information.
b. The company has a programmed of physical verification of fixed
assets, which has been explained to us as a continuous process. As per
the said programmed, certain assets were physically verified during the
year. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable
having regard to the size of the company and nature of its assets.
According to the information and explanation given to us, no material
discrepancies were noticed on such verification except as stated in
clause (d) below.
c. As per information and explanations given to us and as shown by the
books and records and further certified by the management to the
effect, the Company has not disposed of substantial part of fixed
assets during the year.
d. The Management has capitalized under Fixed Assets Accumulated Lease
Equalization Net of Lease Adjustment Account Rs. 47.01 lacs. In our
opinion the same should be written off.
2. In respect of its inventories:
a. The company does not own any stock on hire and repossessed assets.
b. In view of the (a) above the procedures of physical verification of
underlying assets covered by stock on hire and repossessed assets do
not apply to the Company.
c. The company has maintained proper records of underlying assets
covered by stock on hire and repossessed assets.
3. a. The company has not granted loans/ deposits to companies covered in
the register maintained u/s 301 of the companies Act, 1956 during the year.
b. The company has not taken any loan from companies, firms or other
parties covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956. Therefore, the provisions of sub clauses
(e), (f) and (g) of clause 4(iii) of the order is not applicable to the
company.
c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the rate of interest, wherever applicable and other terms
and conditions are not prima facie prejudicial to the interests of the
Company.
d. According to information and explanations given to us, there are
overdue amounts in respect of loans/ deposits given by the Company, as
specified in Notes on Accounts under point 2(d).
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchase and sale of plant and machinery,
equipment and other assets. During the course of our audit, we have
not observed any continuing failure to correct major weakness in
internal control systems.
5. In respect of transactions covered under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956:
(a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements, that need to be entered into in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements have been made on such terms and conditions and at prices,
which are reasonable, having regard to the prevailing market conditions
at relevant time.
6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not complied with the provisions of
Section 58A of the Companies Act, 1956 with relation to the repayment
of the deposits and interest payable thereon.
Company has failed to intimate the Tribunal regarding default in
repayment of deposits and interest from small depositors u/s 58AA of
the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits)
Rules, 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. No
order has been passed by the Company Law Board in terms of Section 58AA
of the Companies Act, 1956.
In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given
to us, the Company has not complied with the directives issued by the
Reserve Bank of India. vide letter no. DNBS (BG)No.2774/
01.02.166/2009-10 dated March 08,2010.viz., placing the letter before
Board of Directors and furnish specific compliance in respect of
repayment of matured deposits, intimation of change in Net Owned Funds,
CRAR, AFC classification, Fair Practices Code, intimating the
depositors two months before maturity of deposits and framing call and
demand loan policy.
7. No Internal Audit and EDP Audit are carried out during the
financial year.
8. The provisions relating to maintenance of cost records under
Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956, do not apply to the Company.
9. In respect of statutory dues:
a) The Company has to remit the following statutory dues
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
1. Provident Fund : 17,68,874
2. E S I : 84,563
3. Professional Tax : 18,060
4. T D S payable : 57,520
6. KVAT : 5,11,722
b. Out of the above, a sum of Rs. 16,78,401/ - is due for more than
six months as on 31.03.2011.
c. There is a disputed sales tax liability of Rs. 4,60,119 (tax,
surcharge and penalty) pending appeal before the Appellate Assistant
Commissioner (CT), III Chennai. A bank guarantee has been furnished for
Rs. 4,60,119/- to Tamilnadu Sales Tax Authorities towards the same.
10. Subject to non-writing off of Rs. 47.01 lacs in respect of
Accumulated Lease Equalization Net of Lease Adjustment Account as
referred to in point no. 1(d) above and Note no. 2 in Notes on Accounts
in Schedule 16 regarding non provision of Rs. 440.63 lacs in respect
of unsecured and doubtful advances and deposits and Net Investment on
lease Rs. 280.37 lacs and interest on deposits amounting to Rs. 16.36
lacs, the Company has brought forward accumulated losses as on 31st
March 2011 amounting to Rs. 601.64 lacs which is more than 50% of its
Net Worth (Rs. 177.31 lacs) and the company has incurred cash loss of
Rs. 32.86 lacs in the current financial year and cash loss of Rs.
105.53 lacs in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. Secured loans from bank is secured by assignment of hire purchase
and lease agreements, lien on fixed deposits and
personal guarantee of some of the present and past directors of the
company. There is no operation in the accounts since 18th September
2008 and the bank has filed a suit before the Debt Recovery Tribunal
and obtained decree against the company since company has defaulted in
repayment of term loan dues to banks.
As per information and explanation given to us, the company has
received a letter dated 16.08.2011 from Karur Vysya Bank Limited for
one time settlement of their dues out of court.
The Company has paid Rs. 75 Lakhs to ING Vysya Bank Ltd subsequent to
the balance sheet date, towards the one time settlement against Term
loan.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans or advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual fund / society.
Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor s
Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.
14. The Company has not traded in shares during the year.
15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantees for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
16. According to the information and explanations given to us and as
shown by
the books of account, the Company has availed term loans from the banks
and have been applied for the purposes for which they have been raised.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet as at 31st March
2011 of the Company, we are of the opinion that both short-term and
long- term funds have been used to finance business assets (short and
long term) and working capital requirements.
18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
19. According to the information and explanations given to us and as
shown by the books of account, the Company has not issued any
debentures during the year.
20. The Company has not raised any money by way of public issue during
the year.
21. According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the
course of our audit.
For Venkat And Vasan
Chartered Accountants
Firm No. 004598 S
Place: Bangalore K S Subramanian
Dated: 5th December, 2011 Partner
M.No. 019923
Mar 31, 2010
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of "MUKUNDA INDUSTRIAL
FINANCE LIMITED" as at 31st March 2010 and also Profit and Loss Account
and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
1. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
2. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of
section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure
hereto a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of
the said order to the extent applicable.
3. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to paragraph 2
above and schedule 16 to Balance Sheet, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as it appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub- section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the
directors, as on 31st March 2010, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
31st March 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts subject to Point no. 1
(d) of Annexure to Auditors Report and note no. 2 and no. 7 / in Notes
on Accounts in Schedule No. 16 part B, give the information required by
the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and
fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally
accepted in India: -
i. in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March 2010;
ii. in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the loss for the
year ended on that date; and
iii. in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the Cash Flows for the
year ended on that date.
(Referred to in Paragraph 2 of our report of even date)
1. In respect of its fixed assets:
a. The Company has maintained relevant records and papers, which
indicates the necessary particulars of quantitative details and
situation of fixed assets on the basis of available information.
b. The company has a programme of physical verification of fixed
assets, which has been explained to us as a continuous process. As per
the said programme, certain assets were physically verified during the
year. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable
having regard to the size of the company and nature of its assets.
According to the information and explanation given to us, no material
discrepancies were noticed on such verification except as stated in
clause (d) below.
c. As per information and explanations given to us and as shown by the
books and records and further certified by the management to the
effect, the Company has not disposed of substantial part of fixed
assets during the year.
d The Management has capitalized under Fixed Assets Accumulated Lease
Equalisation Net of Lease Adjustment Account Rs. 47.01 lacs. In our
opinion the same should be written off.
2. In respect of its inventories:
a. The company has a system of physical verification of underlying
assets covered by stock on hire and repossessed assets on regular
intervals, which have been explained to us as a continuous process.
Having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its business
in our opinion such verification is reasonable.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures
of physical verification of underlying assets covered by stock on hire
and repossessed assets followed by the management are reasonable and
adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its
business.
c. The company has maintained proper records of underlying assets
covered by stock on hire and repossessed assets. As explained to us,
there were no material discrepancies noticed on physical verification
of inventory as compared to the records maintained.
3. a. The company has not granted loans/deposits to companies covered
in the register maintained u/s 301 of the companies Act, 1956 during
the year.
b. The company has not taken any loan from companies, firms or other
parties covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956. Therefore, the provisions of sub clauses (e), (f) and (g) of
clause 4(iii) of the order is not applicable to the company.
c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the rate of interest, wherever applicable and other terms
and conditions are not prima facie prejudicial to the interests of the
Company.
d. According to information and explanations given to us, there are no
overdue amounts in respect of loans/deposits given by the Company.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchase and sale of plant and machinery,
equipment and other assets. During the course of our audit, we have not
observed any continuing failure to correct major weakness in internal
control systems.
5. In respect of transactions covered under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956:
(a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements, that need to be entered into in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements have been made on such terrfis and conditions and at
prices, which are reasonable, having regard to the prevailing market
conditions at relevant time.
6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Section
58A of the Companies Act, 1956.
Company has failed to intimate the Tribunal regarding default in
repayment of deposits and interest from small depositors u/s 58AA of
the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits)
Rules, 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. No
order has been passed by the Company Law Board in terms of Section 58AA
of the Companies Act, 1956.
In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given
to us, the Company has not complied with the directives issued by the
Reserve Bank of India, vide letter no. DNBS (BG)No.2774/ 01.02.166/
2009-10 dated March 08, 201Q.viz.. placing the letter before Board of
Directors and furnish specific compliance in respect of repayment of
matured deposits, intimation of change in Net Owned Funds, CRAR, AFC
classification, Fair Practice Code, intimating the depositors two
months before maturity of deposits and framing call and demand loan
policy.
7. No Internal Audit and EDP Audit are carried out during the
financial year.
8. The provisions relating to maintenance of cost records under
Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956, do not apply to the
Company.
9. In respect of statutory dues:
a. The Company has to remit the following statutory dues
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
1. Provident Fund : 18,91.730
2. ESI : 21,319
3. Professional Tax : 5,450
4. Service Tax : 31,079
5. TDS payable : 24, 143
An amount of Rs. 0.55 lacs is due against VAT and besides these, there
are no undisputed statutory dues.
b. Out of above, a sum of Rs. 16,02,101/- is due for more than six
months as on 31.03.2010.
c. There is a disputed sales tax liability of Rs. 4,60,119 (tax,
surcharge and penalty) pending appeal before the Appellate Assistant
Commissioner (CT), III Chennai. A bank guarantee has been furnished for
Rs. 4,60,119/- to Tamilnadu Sales Tax Authorities towards the same.
10. Subject to non-writing offofRs. 47.01 lacs in respect of
Accumulated Lease Equalisation Net of Lease Adjustment Account as
referred to in point no. 1(d) above and Note no. 2 in Notes on Accounts
in Schedule 16 regarding non provision of Rs. 333.66 lacs in respect of
unsecured and doubtful advances and deposits and Net Investment on
lease Rs. 280.37 lacs and interest on loan facilities availed from ING
Vysya Bank Ltd Rs. 29.65 lacs, the Company has brought forward
accumulated losses as on 31st March 2010 amounting to Rs. 525.29 lacs
which is more than 50% of its Net Worth (Rs. 243.26 lacs) and the
company has incurred cash loss of Rs. 105.53 lacs in the current
financial year and cash loss of Rs. 102.65 lacs in the immediately
preceding financial year.
11. Secured loans from bank is secured by assignment of hire purchase
and lease agreements, lien on fixed deposits and personal guarantee of
some of the present and past directors of the company. There is no
operation in the accounts since 18th September 2008 and the bank has
filed a suit before the Debt Recovery Tribunal and obtained decree
against the company since company has defaulted in repayment of term
loan dues to banks.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans or advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual fund / society.
Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors
Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.
14. The Company has not traded in shares during the year.
15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantees for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
16. According to the information and explanations given to us and as
shown by the books of account, the Company has availed term loans from
the banks and have been applied for the purposes for which they have
been raised.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on an overall examination of
the Balance Sheet as at 31st March 2010 of the Company, we are of the
opinion that both short- term and long-term funds have been used to
finance business assets (short and long term) and working capital
requirements.
18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Art, 1956.
19. According to the information and explanations given to us and as
shown by the books of account, the Company has not issued any
debentures during the year.
20. The Company has not raised any money by way of public issue during
the year.
21. According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the
course of our audit.
For Venkat And Vasan
Chartered Accountants
Firm No. 004598 S
K S Subramanian
Place: Bangalore Partner
Dated: 14th October, 2010 M.no. 019923
Mar 31, 2009
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of MUKUNDA INDUSTRIAL
FINANCE LIMITED as at 31st March 2009 and also Profit and Loss
Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that
date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audit.
1. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
2. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of
section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure
hereto a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of
the said order to the extent applicable.
3. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to paragraph 2
above and schedule 16 to Balance Sheet, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as it appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the
directors, as on 31st March 2009, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
31st March 2009 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts subject to Point no. 1.
d. of Annexure to Auditors Report and note no. 2 and note no. Jin
Notes on Accounts in Schedule No. 16part B give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India: -
i. in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March 2009;
ii. in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the loss for the
year ended on that date; and
iii. in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the Cash Flows for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT
(Referred to in Paragraph 2 of our report of even date)
1. In respect of its fixed assets:
a. The Company has maintained relevant records and papers, which
indicates the necessary particulars of quantitative details and
situation of fixed assets on the basis of available information.
b. The company has a programme of physical verification of fixed
assets, which has been explained to us as a continuous process. As per
the said programme, certain assets were physically verified during the
year. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable
having regard to the size of the company and nature of its assets.
According to the information and explanation given to us, no material
discrepancies were noticed on such verification except as stated in
clause (d) below.
c. As per information and explanations given to us and as shown by the
books and records and further certified by the management to the
effect, the Company has not disposed of substantial part of fixed
assets during the year.
d The Management has capitalized under Fixed .Assets Accumulated Lease
Equalisation Net of Lease Adjustment Account Rs. 47.01 lacs. In our
opinion the same should be written off:
2. In respect of its inventories:
a. The company has a system of physical verification of underlying
assets covered by stock on hire and repossessed assets on regular
intervals, which have been explained to us as a continuous process.
Having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its business
in our opinion such verification is reasonable.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of underlying
assets covered by stock on hire and repossessed assets followed by the
management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the
Company and the nature of its business.
c. The company has maintained proper records of underlying assets
covered by stock on hire and repossessed assets. As explained to us,
there were no material discrepancies noticed on physical verification
of inventory as compared to the records maintained.
3. a. The company has not granted loans/deposits to companies covered
in
the register maintained u,s 301 of the companies Act, 1956 during the
year.
b. The company has not taken any loan from companies, firms or other
parties covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956. Therefore, the provisions of sub clauses (e), (f) and (g) of
clause 4(iii) of the order is not applicable to the company.
c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the rate of interest, wherever applicable and other terms
and conditions are not prima facie prejudicial to the interests of the
Company.
d. According to information and explanations given to us, there are no
overdue amounts in respect of loans/deposits given by the Company.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchase and sale of plant and machinery,
equipment and other assets. During the course of our audit, we have not
observed any continuing failure to correct major weakness in internal
control systems.
5. In respect of transactions covered under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956:.
(a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements, that need to be entered into in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements have been made on such terms and conditions and at prices,
which are reasonable, having regard to the prevailing market conditions
at relevant time.
6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has compiled with the provisions of Section
58A of the Companies Act, 1956.
Company has failed to intimate The Tribunal regarding default in
repayment of deposits and interest from small depositors u/s 58AA of
the Companies Act 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits)
Rules, 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. No
order has been passed by the Company Law Board in terms of Section 58AA
of the Companies Act, 1956.
In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given
to us, the Company has not complied with the directives issued by the
Reserve Bank of India, vide letter no. 01/02/166/2008-09 dated
D3/3/2009.vi2., placing the letter before Board of Directors and
furnish specific compliance in respect of repayment of matured
deposits, intimation of change in Net Owned Funds, CRAR, AFC
classification, Fair Practice Code, intimating the depositors two
months before maturity of deposits and framing call and demand loan
policy.
7. No Internal Audit is carried out during the financial year.
8. The provisions relating to maintenance of cost records under
Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956, do not apply to the
Company.
9. In respect of statutory dues;
a. The Company remitted PF up to May 2008 and an amount of Rs. 6.15
lacs due including employers contribution for the period June 08 to
March has not been remitted till date.
An amount of Rs. 0.55 lacs is due against VAT and besides these; there
are no undisputed statutory dues.
b. Out of above, a sum of Rs. 2,49,588/- towards PF is due for more
than six months as on 31.03,2009.
c. There is a disputed sales tax liability of Rs. 4,60,119 (tax,
surcharge and penalty) pending appeal before the Appellate Assistant
Commissioner (CT), III Chennai. A bank guarantee has been furnished for
Rs. 4,60,119/ - to Tamilnadu Sales Tax Authorities towards the same.
10. Subject to non-writing off of Rs. 47.01 lacs in respect of
Accumulated Lease Equalisation Net of Lease Adjustment Account as
referred to in point no. Id. above and Note no. 2 in Notes on Accounts
in Schedule 16 regarding non provision ofRs. 230.06 lacs in respect of
unsecured and doubtful advances and interest on loan facilities availed
from ING Vysya Bank Ltd Rs. 29.65 lacs, the Company has brought forward
accumulated losses as on 31" March 2009 amounting to Rs. 244.94 lacs
which is less than 50% of its Net Worth (Rs. 554.80 lacs) and the
company has incurred cash loss ofRs 102.65 lacs in the current
financial year and cash loss of Rs. NIL in the immediately preceding
financial year.
11. Secured loans from bank is secured by assignment of hire purchase
and lease agreements, lien on fixed deposits and personal guarantee of
some of the present and past directors of the company. There is no
operation in the accounts since 1& September 20W and the bank has filed
a suit before the Debt Recovery Tribunal since company has defaulted in
repayment of term loan dues to banks.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans or advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual fund / society.
Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors
Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.
14. The Company has not traded in shares during the year.
15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantees for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
16. According to the information and explanations given to us and as
shown by the books of account, the Company has availed term loans from
the banks and have been applied for the purposes for which they have
been raised.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet as at 31st March
2009 of the Company, we are of the opinion that both short-term and
long-term funds have been used to finance business assets (short term)
and working capital requirements.
18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act. 1956.
19. According to the information and explanations given to us and as
shown by the books of account the Company has not issued any debentures
during the year
20. The Company has not raised any money by way of public issue during
the year
21. According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or b; the Company has been noticed or reported during the
course of our audit.
For Venkatand Vasan
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
PLACE: BANGALORE K S Subramanian
DATED: 29.9.2009 PARTNER
M.NO. 019923
Mar 31, 2000
We have Audited the attached Balance Sheet of MUKUNDA INDUSTRIAL
FINANCE LIMITED as at 31st March 2000 and the Profit and Loss Account
of the Company for the year ended on that date, annexed thereto, and
report that:
1. As required by the Manufacturing and other Companies (Auditors
Report) Order, 1988, issued by the Company Law Board in terms of
section 227 (4A) of the Companies Act 1 956, we give in the Annexure
hereto, a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 & 5 of the
said order.
2. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in Paragraph 1
above, we state that:
a. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowl- edge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of
our audit.
b. In our opinion proper Books of Account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of such
books.
c. The Balance sheet and the Profit and Loss Account referred to in
this report are in agree- ment with the Books of Account.
d. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet and the Profit and Loss account
complies with the Mandatory Accounting Standards referred to in Section
21 1 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956.
e. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said Statements of Account read
together with the Notes appearing thereon, give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1 956, in the manner so required and
give a true and fair view:
a. In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the State of Affairs of the
Company as at 31st March 2000 ;
and
b. In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Profit for the
year ended on that date.
(Referred to in Paragraph (I) of our report of even date on the
accounts of MUKUNDA INDUSTRIAL FINANCE LIMITED as at and for the year
ended 31st March 2000}
1. The Company has maintained proper records of fixed assets showing
full particulars including quantitative details and locations thereof.
As informed to us, all fixed assets of the Company have been physically
verified by the management during the year and as informed to us, no
discrepancies between the book records and physical inventory have been
noticed.
2. None of the fixed assets have been revalued during the year.
3. In our opinion, the rate of interest and the terms and conditions
on which loans, secured or unsecured have been obtained from directors
and companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, are not, prima facie,
prejudicial to the interests of the Company.
4. The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to
companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
5. Advances in the nature of loans given to employees and others have
generally been recovered together with interest as per stipulations
wherever applicable.
6. In respect of Hire-purchase, Lease and Bills Discounting
transactions entered into by the Company in the ordinary course of its
business, repayment of instalments thereon has generally been made by
the parties on due dates and where instalments are overdue, we are of
the opinion that reasonable steps have been taken by the Company for
recovery of the same.
7. In our opinion and in accordance with the information and
explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control
procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of
its business for purchase of plant and machinery, equipment and other
assets.
8. As per information available, in the case of purchase of goods,
materials, sale of goods, and services in pur- suance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956, aggregating during the year to Rs.50,000/- or
more in respect of each party, the prices paid/realised are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices for such goods, materials
and services and are comparable to the prices for similar goods,
materials and services in transactions with other parties.
9. As per information and explanations made available, in respect of
deposits accepted from public, the company has complied with the
directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of
section 58A of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed thereunder.
10. In our opinion, the Internal Audit System of the Company is
commensurate with its size and the nature of its business.
11. According to the records of the Company, Provident Fund and
Employees State Insurance dues have been regularly deposited with the
appropriate authorities.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
books and records examined by us, there are no undisputed amounts
payable in respect of Income- Tax, Wealth-Tax, Sales-Tax, Customs duty
or Excise Duty outstanding as at 31st March 2000 for a period exceeding
six months from the dote they became payable.
13. The Company has a policy of authorising expenditure based on
reasonable checks and controls. The policy is intended to ensure that
expenses are authorised on the basis of contractual obligations or
accepted business practices having regard to the companys business
needs and exigencies. In terms of these observations and as per the
information and explanations given to us, we have not come across any
expenses charged to Profit and Loss Account which to the best of our
knowledge and belief, could be regarded as personal expenses.
14. The Company has not granted any loans or advances on the basis of
any security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other similar
securities.
15. None of the provisions of any special statute applicable to chit
fund, nidhi or mutual benefit society is applicable to the Company.
16. As per information made available to us, the Company is not
dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other
investments. The shares, securities, debentures and other investments
are held by the Company in its own name.
17. As the Company has no manufacturing activities, the provisions of
clause iii, iv, v, vi, xii, xiv, xvi & xx of para 4 (A) of the
Manufacturing and other Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 1988 are
not applicable.
For B.N. Govinda Prasad
Chartered Accountants
Place : Bangalore B.N.G. Kumar
Dated : 27th April, 2000 Partner
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article